There’s a kind of silence that settles over some teams, not the good kind, like the one that comes after solving a hard problem, but a hollow, unnatural stillness. You sense it in meetings where everyone agrees too quickly. Where “great idea” floats around like confetti, even when the idea’s shaky. Where concerns are buried beneath smiles, and dissent arrives only after hours, in DMs that start with “just between us…”
It’s not that people don’t see what’s wrong. They do. But they’ve learned not to say it.
That instinct to withhold, to blend in, to appear agreeable isn’t laziness or cowardice. It’s something subtler and more corrosive. It’s what Friedrich Nietzsche called “herd morality”. A moral compass outsourced to the crowd. In modern offices, it wears a friendly face. It looks like being a “team player.” It hides behind words like “alignment,” “respect,” and “culture,” but underneath it all is fear. Not fear of being wrong. Fear of being seen as wrong.
And that’s the part that keeps people weak.
Let’s be honest. Most people don’t want to be virtuous at work. They want to look virtuous. It’s safer. Easier. Cleaner. The illusion is enough.
You learn this fast in tech. Early on, someone contradicts a popular initiative. Maybe pointing out the new performance dashboard measures superficial activities rather than meaningful results, or noting weekly town halls lack substantive discussion, and they’re met with a long pause. Nobody argues. Nobody agrees either. Just the quiet sound of people mentally stepping back. Later, they’re subtly excluded from key strategy sessions, not explicitly punished, just gently sidelined.
People notice.
So they adapt. They nod when the room nods. They praise ideas they privately question. They build reputations as the “reasonable one,” the “safe pair of hands,” the person who always sees the merit in what leadership says, even when leadership’s wrong. Slowly, their public self splits from their private mind.
They’re not lying. Not exactly. They’re surviving.
But it’s survival at the cost of truth.
There’s an irony here. In a field that prizes “first principles thinking,” so many operate by secondhand conviction. They don’t ask: “Is this true?” They ask: “Is this safe to say?”
It shows in code reviews where nobody challenges architecture decisions. In strategy decks padded with language that “feels right” but says little. In retros where root causes go untouched because naming them would implicate people who matter.
All of it stems from the same source, the desire to be seen as correct, good, just. But not too correct. Not in a way that disrupts the group’s moral consensus.
This is where Nietzsche’s critique bites. He argued that “morality,” when reduced to social compliance, flattens the individual. It makes people docile. They trade their capacity to challenge, question, and lead for a sense of belonging. That’s the weakness. And it thrives in places that reward moral posture over actual clarity.
In tech, that posture often sounds progressive and high-minded. But posture is not the principle. Its performance. And it kills the thing most tech companies claim to value: boldness.
The psychologist Solomon Asch ran a famous experiment in the 1950s, subjects were shown a line and asked to match it to one of three others. The answer was obvious. But when everyone else in the room (all actors) picked the wrong line, 75% of real participants conformed at least once.
This wasn’t stupidity. It was pressure. Social distortion of perception.
Replace the lab coats with hoodies and the lines with product plans, and you’ll find the same effect in most teams. Someone has a better idea, sees a risk, knows the numbers don’t add up, but stays silent. Not because they’re unsure. Because they don’t want to be the first hand up.
Because going first means standing out. And standing out means exposure. And exposure, in companies where moral alignment is prized over truth, is dangerous.
So the first voice stays quiet. And everyone else breathes easier.
Herd morality has a strange side effect. It makes workplaces feel calm, polite, and well-run. On the surface, it looks like strength: a unified team, shared values, smooth meetings.
But the strength is paper-thin.
Underneath is fragility. Fragility that shows up in slow decision-making, in teams that panic under pressure, in cultures that celebrate diversity of background but punish diversity of thought. The minute a real crisis hits — a failed launch, a PR issue, a mass resignation. The weakness reveals itself. Nobody knows how to disagree productively. Nobody wants to take real ownership. The leaders flinch. The followers wait. Everything slows.
And yet, even in those moments, the team might cling to its moral self-image. It’s how they cope. We care. We tried. We meant well. As if good intent could substitute for clarity, foresight, or backbone.
It can’t.
Strong cultures tolerate discomfort. They don’t mistake politeness for trust. They allow people to hold opposing views without framing them as betrayal. They don’t ask for conformity in tone and belief under the guise of “alignment.”
Real strength is quiet, but not timid. It doesn’t chase applause. It doesn’t need to be seen as correct to feel secure.
In a strong team, someone can say, “This idea doesn’t make sense,” and the response isn’t moral panic or forced harmony. It’s curiosity. “Why? Show me.” In a strong company, someone can challenge a cherished value, not because they’re malicious, but because they care more about outcomes than slogans, and they’re still trusted afterward.
That kind of culture is rare. It takes nerve. And it only survives if enough people are willing to trade comfort for honesty.
If you’re in tech, and you’ve ever found yourself nodding along when you wanted to object, or complimenting work you knew needed a rewrite, or praising a decision you’d privately never make — pause.
Ask yourself: Who am I trying to please?
What am I afraid of?
What would I say if I didn’t need to be liked?
The answers might scare you. That’s good. Real clarity usually does.
Start with one small act of honesty. Say the thing nobody else will say, but that everyone quietly knows. Watch what happens. You’ll either start a conversation that needed to happen, or you’ll learn something about the place you work, and the people you work with.
Herd morality wants you to believe that strength means staying agreeable. It doesn’t. Strength means standing still when others sway. It means trusting your convictions enough to voice them, even when it costs you some approval.
Especially then.
Because in the long run, the teams that win aren’t the ones who always look aligned. They’re the ones who, behind closed doors, argue fiercely, think freely, and sharpen each other through truth.
They’re not the nicest teams.
They’re just the strongest.
If this piece was helpful or resonated with you, you can support my work by buying me a Coffee!
Become a subscriber receive the latest updates in your inbox.
Member discussion